The AI bubble, much like the dot-com frenzy of the late 1990s, represents a intoxicating surge of investment and hype that has propelled artificial intelligence from niche research labs to the forefront of global economies. Fueled by breakthroughs in generative models like GPT-4 and beyond, venture capital has poured hundreds of billions into startups and tech giants, inflating valuations to stratospheric levels—Nvidia’s market cap alone eclipsed $3 trillion in 2024 amid chip demand for AI training. Yet, beneath the euphoria lies a precarious undercurrent: many applications remain experimental, with tangible returns elusive for all but a handful of players, raising fears of an impending correction as energy costs soar, regulatory scrutiny intensifies, and investor patience wanes. While the bubble’s burst could cull the weak and refocus innovation on practical utility—from autonomous systems to personalized medicine—the real risk is not collapse, but stagnation, should the rush for quick wins overshadow AI’s transformative potential.
The dot-com bubble of the late 1990s and the current AI frenzy share an uncanny resemblance: both are tales of explosive optimism, reckless capital, and the intoxicating promise of a technology poised to remake the world. What began as the internet’s wild west—pet.com and Webvan burning through fortunes on Super Bowl ads—mirrors today’s AI gold rush, where startups like Anthropic and xAI rake in billions on the back of chatbots and image generators. But beneath the similarities lie lessons from the past that could either doom or define AI’s future.
The dot-com crash wasn’t the end of the internet but in a way it was its reset button, compressing a decade of maturation into years. AI could follow suit: a 2026-2027 correction might slash valuations but accelerate adoption in sectors like healthcare and logistics. Today AI arrives with proven wins eg. AlphaFold’s protein folding breakthrough rivals the browser’s invention and a more mature ecosystem. Yet, the peril is the same: if investors chase moonshots over mundane ROI, we risk repeating 2000’s folly.
Earlier the internet was hailed as the ultimate disruptor, with visions of frictionless e-commerce and global connectivity. Media frenzy and Wall Street cheerleading drove NASDAQ from 1,000 in 1995 to over 5,000 by 2000, fueled by “new economy” rhetoric that ignored profitability. Generative AI, sparked by ChatGPT’s 2022 debut, has sparked similar euphoria. Terms like “AGI” (artificial general intelligence) echo the era’s “killer apps,” with headlines touting AI’s role in everything from drug discovery to autonomous driving. By mid-2025, AI-related stocks have propelled the S&P 500 to record highs, much like the NASDAQ’s ascent. In both cases, narrative trumped numbers. Dot-com firms often had no revenue; today’s AI unicorns boast user growth but razor-thin margins, with training costs for models like GPT-5 exceeding $100 million per run.
Global AI investment topped $200 billion in 2024 alone (per CB Insights), with mega-rounds like OpenAI’s $6.6 billion raise in 2024 at a $157 billion valuation. Public markets echo this: Nvidia’s stock surged 200%+ in 2023-2024 on AI chip demand, akin to Cisco’s dominance in networking gear. During Dot-Com Era, Venture capital hit $100 billion annually by 2000, funding 15,000+ startups. IPOs like VA Linux’s 698% first-day pop in 1999 epitomized the madness, but 90% of dot-coms failed by 2004. Billions flowed into fiber-optic cables and servers, creating overcapacity that lingered post-crash. Survivors like Amazon turned excess bandwidth into AWS, birthing cloud computing. Today data centers are gobbling 2-3% of global electricity by 2025 (IEA estimates). Hyperscalers like Microsoft and Google are pouring $100B+ into AI-ready infrastructure, from GPUs to undersea cables. A bust could leave stranded assets, but it might also spawn the next backbone, like AI-optimized edge computing.
During Dot-Com Era, NASDAQ plunged 78% from 2000-2002, wiping out $5 trillion. Culprits? Rising interest rates, earnings misses, and 9/11’s shock. But the crash weeded out fluff, paving the way for Web 2.0. Today AI is Warning signs abound by late 2025: cooling VC tempos (down 20% YoY), antitrust probes into Big Tech AI monopolies, and talent exodus as burnout hits. A trigger like Fed hikes or a high-profile flop (e.g., delayed AGI timelines) could spark a 30-50% sector pullback, per Goldman Sachs forecasts.
Galactik Views