Carl Sagan, an astronomer and science communicator, often emphasized the interplay between science and economics, viewing science as a driver of economic progress and societal benefit. While he didn’t focus extensively on economics as a discipline, his writings and talks, reflect a belief that scientific inquiry fuels innovation, which in turn shapes economic systems and human welfare.
Sagan argued that science is an investment in humanity’s future. He saw technological advancements—driven by curiosity-led research—as key to economic growth, job creation, and solving practical problems like energy, health, and resource scarcity. For instance, in Cosmos, he highlighted how discoveries in astronomy and physics led to technologies like computers and medical imaging, which revolutionized economies. He believed that funding basic research, even without immediate applications, yields long-term economic dividends, as seen in the space program’s contributions to satellite technology and global communications.
The 2025 Nobel Prize in Economics—formally known as the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel—was awarded on October 13, 2025, by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Joel Mokyr (Northwestern University, USA) was awarded half of the prize for identifying the historical and cultural prerequisites for sustained technological progress and economic growth. His work, including books like A Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy (2016), emphasizes how openness to new ideas, scientific inquiry, and institutional factors enabled the Industrial Revolution and long-term prosperity. Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt were Jointly awarded the other half for developing a theoretical framework on “creative destruction”—a concept popularized by Joseph Schumpeter—explaining how innovations replace outdated technologies, fostering continuous economic expansion. Their seminal 1992 paper and subsequent models quantify how #competition, #patents, and policy influence this process. The Nobel Committee highlighted that the laureates’ research shows economic growth is not inevitable but depends on nurturing innovation, science-based progress, and societal adaptability to avoid stagnation.
This prize underscores the economics field’s focus on innovation’s role in addressing modern challenges like productivity slowdowns and technological disruption.
Creative destruction is the engine of long-term economic growth in capitalist systems. Innovations, such as the steam engine, electricity, or digital technology, revolutionize markets by introducing superior alternatives. While this creates wealth, jobs, and efficiency, it also renders existing technologies, skills, or companies obsolete, leading to short-term economic disruption, job losses, or firm failures. Schumpeter saw this as an inevitable and necessary feature of capitalism’s dynamism. This economic concept was pioneered by Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter in the 1940s, notably in his book Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1942). It describes the process by which innovation—new technologies, products, or business models—disrupts and replaces outdated industries, firms, or practices, driving economic progress. The term captures the dual nature of this process: creation of new opportunities through the destruction of old structures.
The 2025 Nobel Prize in Economics, awarded to Philippe Aghion, Peter Howitt, and Joel Mokyr, directly ties to creative destruction. Aghion and Howitt’s theoretical models (starting with their 1992 paper) formalized how innovation drives growth through creative destruction.
It has to be remembered that Carl Sagan emphasis on science as a driver of progress aligns with creative destruction. Sagan saw scientific innovation as essential for economic and societal advancement, but he also warned against short-sighted economic policies that prioritize immediate profits over transformative research, which could hinder the creative destruction process. 2025 Noble prize on creative destruction explains how innovation reshapes economies by replacing the old with the new, driving growth but requiring careful management of its social and economic costs.
Sagan also cautioned against short-term economic thinking that undervalues science. Sagan criticized cuts to scientific funding, arguing that neglecting research for immediate profit risks stagnating progress. He saw science as a public good, not just a commercial tool, warning that over-reliance on market-driven innovation could prioritize trivial products over transformative discoveries.
On economics directly, Sagan was sceptical of unchecked capitalism. He noted in interviews and writings that wealth disparities, if extreme, could destabilize societies and hinder collective scientific efforts. He explored themes of resource allocation, questioning whether humanity could prioritize cooperative scientific endeavors over militaristic or profit-driven pursuits and advocated for equitable distribution of science’s benefits, like clean energy or medical advances, to ensure broad societal gains. Sagan also tied economics to environmental stewardship. In Pale Blue Dot, he warned that exploiting Earth’s resources without scientific foresight such as ignoring climate science could lead to economic and ecological collapse. He pushed for sustainable practices, informed by science, to balance economic growth with planetary health. Sagan viewed science as a catalyst for economic prosperity but urged that it be guided by long-term vision and ethical considerations, not just market forces. His perspective remains relevant in debates over funding research, addressing inequality, and tackling global challenges like climate change.
Galactik Views